They’re cutting the agencies that protect you!

The latest lament over lessening government largesse

A number of people, many of them doctors, have taken to social media posting their anguish about jobs being cut from the CDC and FDA. Some have gone so far as to claim that the world, not just the U.S., will suffer as a result. After all, these agencies exist to protect us and improve our health, right?

Let’s see, this is the same FDA that approved the Covid jabs under EUA and touted the “safe and effective” trope. This same FDA that had a list of potential adverse events for those “safe and effective” shots that included:

• Acute myocardial infarction

• Anaphylaxis

• Appendicitis

• Bell’s Palsy Narcolepsy

• Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)

• Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)

• Encephalomyelitis

• Guillain-Barré syndrome

• Hemorrhagic Stroke

• Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)

• Myocarditis/Pericarditis

• Non-hemorrhagic Stroke

• Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

• Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia

• Transverse Myelitis

https://www.fda.gov/media/150051/download

Outside of the “conspiracy theorists,” how many times did you hear any “public health” agency mention most of these side effects?

These same agencies said that if people took the shots, they could not get infected nor transmit the disease.

But I don’t want to belabor this specific point. The issue goes further.

I have written before about the FDA’s lack of care about your health. Now more previously buried data is making the news. Fluoride is in the spotlight as new studies have found that fluoride exposure is connected to lowered child IQ. But studies already existed showing fluoride toxicity, not only neurological, but metabolic as well. This is another issue about which I previously wrote.

These agencies (and many of the doctors favoring these agencies) have demonized pharmaceuticals that have been used safely for decades (ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine) in favor of concoctions known to have serious adverse effects (remdesivir).

These agencies remove effective and innocuous OTC remedies (like phenylpropanolamine) from the market based on one poorly designed study, yet leave other medications with laundry lists of proven adverse effects to be marketed on TV.

Despite the known dangers, these agencies allow colorings and chemical additives in our food supply that other countries have banned because of those known dangers.

These agencies are responsible for the unnecessary and misguided killing of 65 million chickens since September of last year in their effort to stop bird flu. Never mind what that has done to the price and availability of chicken and eggs.

These agencies routinely bury studies and persecute professionals that go against the accepted narrative, whether it be vaccine safety, water fluoridation, toxic chemicals that they’ve deemed “safe,” or anything else they see as a threat to their authority or funding.

These agencies are compromised. They are revolving doors for employees between the agencies and the entities they were instituted to regulate.

To accept any of this, two major truths must be ignored or overlooked:

1. There is no such thing as “public health.”

2. The federal government has no constitutional authority to be involved in these endeavors.

Can you define “public health”? I’m sure someone has developed a definition for political purposes, but in reality, no such thing exists. You have your health, I have my health, but we don’t share health. We may at some point share illness, but again, we are individuals and government has no business being involved in my personal health decisions nor yours.

Which brings us to the next point: the Constitution. Nowhere in the Constitution is the federal government granted the power to create and run agencies involved in science, medicine, and research. If you believe otherwise, I challenge you to cite Article and Section. Before you cite the “general Welfare” clause of Article I, Section 8, realize that, even if interpreted in the broadest sense - as it has been since only the 1930s or so - it would merely grant Congress the power to raise funds for such purpose, not to create agencies nor run them. Congress’ powers are still limited to those specifically outlined in the Constitution.

There is much, much more that could have been included here, but I wanted to keep this short and simple. So before you get your surgical mask in a bunch over the whittling down of these agencies, you should recognize the fact that they never should have existed to begin with.