16 Comments

As we were prone to say when growing up; RDD (Read the Damn Directions)!

👍👍👍👍

Expand full comment

When I was a kid, welfare had just begun to become a career, in earnest. Single unwed mothers were scandalous, but the legalization of abortion, The Pill, and no-fault divorce opened the gubmint Gibbs Doors wide.

Time was that communities, neighbors, and family members saw to the needs of desperate individuals and families. The situations and circumstances were never "secret" and part of the motivation to "do better" was the humility of accepting help. Of course, there were those incapable of experiencing shame, but they were few and far between.

We have lost sight of integrity, morals, ethics, values, and commitment to God, family, and community. How do we even begin to stuff that genie back into the proverbial bottle?

Expand full comment

Many still don't understand that toppling the foundational pillars of God and family are what has led to the departure from integrity, morals, ethics, and even community. People think they can have morals without God; but on what, then, are morals based? Where is the objective source? It is not simply consensus. This is the failure of relativism. Without an objective standard, everything is relative; and when everything is relative, no one can say that someone else's "truth" isn't true.

That said, there is still a failure on the part of Americans to understand the purpose of government and keep it in its place. This is why the federal government is the largest employer in the country - something the founders never intended and certainly would never have permitted.

Expand full comment

When I was training my Labrador for duck hunting, setting boundaries and "rules" and reinforcing them made for a very confident and contented dog. This follows with human beings. Knowing our "place" and setting goals and expectations makes for confident and contented people. Knowing that there are consequences for bad choices is also a great guide for daily living.

Expand full comment

One other point: it is a purely Marxist strategy to replace God and family with the State (i.e. government). When government takes the place of God and family, they control everything.

Expand full comment

Exactly.

Expand full comment

Lisa, one thing you said stuck out to me. For many years I associated HUMILTY with shame. As I was searching for spiritual answers, I was given a great bit of counselling by my childhood preacher. He said that humility had more to do being HUMBLE than of shaming a person. It is only when you humble yourself before God and own your mistakes of the past and ask His forgiveness that you can turn things around in your life and live better and sin less. (No one ever truly stops sinning. It is in our nature to do so. All we can do is make a conscious effort to not sin and when we do we own it and try to do better.)

I hope I didn't come off as too "preachy", I just had that memory come to mind as I read your comment.

As for the rest I am certainly in agreement on pretty much all of it. The destruction of the nuclear family and forcing God out of the government and schools certainly played a BIG part in the downward spiral we have been caught in.

One of my favorite sayings I learned in my spiritual journey is, "EGO+ Edging God Out." our individual and COLLECTIVE egos pushed God out of our daily lives (at least for some). And God does not go where he is not wanted. He will let us flounder in our misery until we BEG Him for forgiveness and to return to our lives as THE guiding light.

Expand full comment

"Humility" has nothing to do with shame. It's the acceptance that we are fallible and that an attitude of gratitude for all of my blessings is practicing humility.

Expand full comment

Excellent rant.

While the founding fathers did an excellent job, in hindsight I'm inclined to say they should have added in a "reset clause". Something like "We know that in 125 years this government will have become hopelessly corrupt, thus everyone in government is automatically fired / purged and each state must select representatives to renegotiate and reconsider the nation and design of government."

Expand full comment

Hopefully, in an ideal world, the state representatives would conclude: "Dang that is a good design, here is a tiny update and here is a bit of clarification, now let's elect new politicians and give it another 125 years!"

Expand full comment

If only we lived in a perfect world. There IS a reset clause in the Declaration of Independence.

" But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

We DO have the obligation, right and duty to reframe the government at ANY time. Sadly, getting the Convention of States to come together to actually make that happen is a VERY difficult thing. But, it was designed to be difficult so it wouldn't be done on a whim.

The thing that makes it near impossible right now is the fact that there are so many brainwashed into thinking that what is happening in our government is how it's supposed to be. They are content with letting the government control almost every aspect of their lives. Pitiful fools.

Expand full comment

Yes, but 0.0001% of citizens have read that part and worse only 0.01% of those understood it and of those 0.002% have the courage to do anything about it.

A Convention of States is very hazardous as most likely all the representatives would be just more of the same crowd of politicians and probably would do more harm than good to the constitution.

Expand full comment

I could not agree more. The hard part is then implementing that which has been read. I'm not an IT guy, I can barely navigate the web without getting sucked down a virtual rabbit hole or five. I do tend to be easily distracted and I was likely ADHD before ADHD was a thing.

I got labeled a rowdy, disruptive kid in school and it kinda went downhill from there. First day of Kindergarten I got sent to the Principal's office. Climbing on the jungle gym during recess, a kid above me kicked me in the face. A bloody nose and a scream of rage catapulted me to the top where I pushed the kid that kicked me off of the top and he broke his arm on the way down. I suppose today that would have garnered a SWAT response, a school wide lockdown and 37 grief counselors to steer the 16 other kids kids through their pre-PTSD reactions. I likely would not be kicked out of school, but end up chemically lobotomized like so many kids are these days, to help ME come to terms with MY lack of impulse control. Because all of these "experts" agree that giving brain chemistry altering chemicals to brains not yet fully developed, is the only way to deal with rambunctious, easily bored, five year old. Never mind that violent outbursts and suicidal ideation are among the top side effects of said "medications". They've got "meds" for that too. Oh, and the jungle gym would be dismantled, in fact, playing outside would be found to be detrimental to a small subset of kindergartners, so that normal, relatively benign, activity, would be replaced with safe, non-offensive, gender 'affirming' studies on a screen.

Okay, so what does any of that have to do with those charged with carrying out our system of representative government? I'm glad you asked. It goes without saying that an overwhelming majority of those placed in seats of government have not RTFM. Oddly enough, those that have and successfully offer themselves to the individuals to represent them, do so with the best intentions, but something happens after they enter The swamp. Be it local, relatively, or federal, which is more often the case. Is there something in the water? Well, it is a swamp after all, but the 'peer' pressure can be devastating and to be placed in committees where those best intentions can be effective, the new swamp denizens must "play the game". How the very serious service to "The People" has become a game is just one of many areas where government of all types has lost its way. Whether by accident or design, the 'manual' has been all but ignored and only becomes a topic in debates if it serves the swamp creatures and their agenda of securing their lucrative positions, maintaining the status quo, and growing the deep state in which all their largesse depends. The "service" half of public service has been abandoned. A couple of anecdotes illustrate that very well.

In 1995, my family and I attended the Minnesota State Fair. (when people interject into conversation, something like, "That's not fair." My standard response is, the FAIR is in August and they charge admission. That's what I'm referring to.) A small crowd had gathered around Skip Humphrey, the then, Attorney General for the state of Minnesota. He was pontificating on his stunning and brave lawsuit against the tobacco industry. A field that those of a certain political bent will go on endlessly about how evil and harmful it is, yet they never attempt to dismantle or outlaw said big business. I mean if it were truly the threat they claim, one would believe that anyone honest in a position to eliminate such a clear and present danger, would go for the kill, all in an effort to safeguard the public they swore to serve. But no, they collect too much money from tobacco in all it's forms. Manipulating and restricting such endeavors gets them more money than actually dealing with what we're told is an existential threat to all humanity. Well, we know they're not honest, don't we?

So as he went on and on about how he was humbly looking out for the little guy. that's you and me, they've told us, I managed to get his attention. My "question", which was more of a statement, went something like this. -

You're not helping the 'little guy'. You said that tobacco is harder on those of modest or poor income, yet every "solution" you and those like you enacted to 'help' only makes tobacco more expensive. Your actions won't punish the 'little guy' you say you're looking out for. They'll only make tobacco more expensive. If that's "helping", just stop. I don't need your help. I don't want your help. I didn't ask for your help. Stop helping. Get off my side.

That brought a lot of chuckles and smiles from the crowd, most of us with cigarettes in our hands or hanging from our mouths. apparently that wasn't the reaction he was looking for and after a couple of flustered 'fish gulps', opening and closing his mouth without uttering a sound, he stunningly and bravely came back with a riff on, "Do you know who I am?"

My immediate reply was, "Of course I do. You're the Attorney General of Minnesota. An elected position. That means you work for me." I then began pointing around the crowd. "And her, and them, and him. You work for us."

That got a loud reaction from the crowd and a lot of voices were added to the mix and any response he may have given was drowned out by the cacophony that followed. Suddenly, his :people" remembered an appointment he was late for and they hustled him away. That got me some cheers of approval, some back slaps, and handshakes, but we still ended up paying a dollar more a pack almost immediately.

In 2012, after the TEA Party had been murdered by Democrats, the Media, and a whole bunch of Republicans, I hears about an interaction between John McCain and a Freshman Senator about an addendum for a Bill that was being considered. I've looked several times to find the article, or even C-SPAN footage of the exchange, but no luck. Basically, it went something like this. There had been heated debate over this add on to a Bill and the new Senator suggested they vote on the Bill as it stood, then vote on the addendum as a single issue Bill. If the addition had all the merit McCain and others said it did, it should easily pass on its own merit. This incensed McCain and he snapped at the new guy, "That's not how we do things here!"

My immediate thought was, "Yes, And that's the problem."

Our government has strayed far off the path it was meant to follow. this didn't happen over night, but these days, its being so far from intent is so ingrained into the day to day working of all three federal branches at the top all the way down to school boards and city councils, it's very hard to find anyone that remembers or even knows intrinsically that it's not supposed to be this way. we cannot look to the coming generations to return us to the way it's supposed to be. They're ignorant. That's not their fault. They haven't been taught History or Civics. The proof of that is displayed daily in these pro Hamas demonstrations in high schools and colleges the world over. Kindergartners are taught gender dysphoria rather than primary colors, seeing Dick and Jane chase Spot, or 2+2=4. And those insisting that those things are important are labeled racist, homophobic, privileged, nazis that need to be cancelled.

There are means available to rectify this, but the exigencies and priorities of life as presented by those invested in indoctrination and compliance, won't allow things like an Article V Convention of States gain enough support to even begin turning the ship of state. We're heading for the reef at flank speed and playing by the rules will be far too slow to avert disaster. There are other, messier methods, but even elections cannot turn the tide. 2020m proved that without even trying. Belt fed machines like those created by John Moses Browning could arrest the decline and forcing the replacement to step over the pile the Browning created would be great motivation to do what's right, would be the fastest, yet messiest way to achieve said goals, but the most peaceful way would be to completely drain the swamp. Burn the remaining vestiges to the ground, then insist any wishing to enter "public service" must prove proficiency in understanding the Constitution before taking an oath. It's hard to protect and defend something you have little or no understanding of.

I've always been the one to caution those that want to burn it all down and start over, but lately I've got five gallons of gas in a can the government regulations ruined and a box of matches that don't light, because of even more government "help", but I do have a magnifying glass and wood shavings, which was all I could afford because government helped the lumber industry.

Expand full comment

I too was one of THOSE kids in kindergarten that was a "rebel" of sorts and was in trouble quite a bit. I was sent to the principal's office once because I refused to stop playing with a certain toy to let another kid play with it. I proclaimed that I got it first and I wasn't done playing with it. I got "3 licks" with a wiffle ball bat for that one. I promptly stood upright and told the principal that I liked how he had is office fixed up. He did a face palm and told my mother to be careful with me because I had "a mind of his own." HA HA HA... AHHH those were the days.

You touched on SO many other issues that I totally agree contributed to our downfall. I think one of the biggest problems is the fact that civics and NON-watered down/WHITE washed history were cut from the curriculum of public schools. They were even cut in some of the private schools in the Charleston area where I grew up. Thankfully, the Christian private schools did NOT change their teachings and at least SOME of the people that grew up down there got a dose of reality.

And, as you said, the government took it upon themselves to "take care of us" in manners that DID NOT need to be. One of the most annoying things that the state of North Carolina does to "take care" of the citizens of the state is to force them to report once a year that they do not have any vision problems that would impair their ability to drive, IF you are honest and put on your drivers license application that you have an issue like diabetes (like me). I do go to my doctor at least once if not 2 or 3 times a year to make sure I don't have any advanced retinopathy. And by the Grace of God I do not at this point. But the fact that I HAVE to tell the DMV about my condition or have my license suspended is OUTRAGIOUS. I understand there are people that are not honest with THEMSELVES about how bad their vision has become. But, doctors here are required to report issues that WILL impair the driver. It's maddening!

It has been driven into the brains of they younger generations that they are ENTITLED to EQUITY rather than EQUALITY in life and the government is her to insure they get that. It truly is mindboggling the mentality of the last 2 generations.

AND, don't get me started on how the WHITE MAN is the root of all evil in the world now. Or how we are to ignore the great things our Founding Fathers did to break us away from the tyranny of King George. Instead we are to focus on the things that TODAY are not in practice and are seen as EVIL. (Slavery) They could NOT be good people because they did things that were common practice IN THAT TIME. YIKES!

I could go on and on about the lack of PROPER education and lack of knowledge about our system of government we have today. But, I need to get off my soapbox before I pop a vessel in my head.

Expand full comment

AMEN!

Expand full comment

"Unfortunately, as with so many devices, users are not inclined to read or understand; instead, they want to push buttons, pull levers, tweak settings, and try to make a device do what they want rather than operate as it is intended".

I knew a woman 20 some-odd years ago that told me she LOVED Windows based programs because she could "manipulate" it to do what SHE wanted. Never mind she constantly had issues with the programs like Excel and Word shutting down when she was near the end of whatever task she was working on, thus wiping out ALL the work she had put into the spreadsheet or document. This would infuriate her, but she NEVER would accept that it MIGHT be her "manipulations" that caused the problems.

When I was a kid and was JUST starting to learn about the forming of our country and how our government is INTENDED to work, I was easily lead to believe that it WAS the government that granted us the rights listed in the Bill of Rights. THANKFULLY, I had people around be that set me straight on that bass akwards thinking. I am STILL learning MORE of the more detailed nuances of our Founders intentions. There are the Federalist papers, anti-federalist papers, and all sorts of other personal writings from the Founders and those around when the country/government was being formed.

I am sure I will continue to learn more and more about HOW our founding documents were worded and structured as I do more and more reading. Thankfully, I have a fairly solid understanding at this point and anything else I learn is icing on the cake. Or should I say whipped cream on the American pie?

Expand full comment